Hire Solidity Developers: Dedicated EVM Teams

At a glance

RedDuck has been an EVM engineering team since 2020: 10 Solidity engineers, 100+ deliveries shipped to mainnet, 0 post-release critical vulnerabilities, and 20+ external audits passed with Hacken and Sherlock. Hiring Solidity developers here does not mean renting seats — you get a team that owns contract architecture, testing, audit preparation, and mainnet deployment as one accountable engagement. The portfolio below is named and checkable: tokenized treasuries for a live RWA issuer, an omnichain ERC-7540 vault, a perp DEX on Arbitrum, and a proposed Ethereum standard.

Engagement models

Dedicated team

A stable Solidity team — contract engineers plus the testing and DevOps support they need — working as your protocol bench over months. The composition flexes with the roadmap: heavier on contract work before an audit, heavier on integration after it.

Best for: Protocols with a living roadmap: new mechanisms, upgrades, and audit cycles that never really end.

Project-based

A scoped engagement with a defined deliverable: a contract system designed, built, tested to our audit-ready baseline, taken through an external audit, and deployed. One team owns it from architecture review to handover.

Best for: A defined build — a token system, a vault, a protocol module — where you want a hard scope and a clean handover.

The bench behind your team

10EVM / Solidity

10Solana / Rust

5Hedera / Hashgraph

5Zero-Knowledge

15TypeScript

100+Shipped to mainnet

150+Clients served

20+Audits passed

0Post-release criticals

$1M+Total earned (all time)

Stack counts overlap — the same engineers ship on more than one stack. These are company-wide facts, not the size of a single project team: your team is assembled from this bench to match the scope.

Solidity work we own

EVM work is the core of the practice: DeFi mechanics, RWA tokenization with compliance enforced at the contract level, token standards from ERC-20 to ERC-4626, ERC-3643, and ERC-1400, upgradeable architectures with strict access control, and the off-chain services that keep protocols running. Every project below shipped with the same baseline — 100% branch coverage before an auditor sees the code, coordinated with Hacken and Sherlock.

RWA Tokenization

Core contracts behind a live tokenized-treasury issuer: deposit and redemption vaults priced off a NAV data feed, with greenlist, blacklist, and a sanctions oracle gating every transfer.

Solidity · Hardhat · OpenZeppelin upgradeable · Chainlink-compatible feeds

Omnichain NAV-Priced Vault

An ERC-4626/ERC-7540 vault that accepts deposits from any chain and issues shares where the user wants them — LayerZero OFT wiring, async redemptions, and oracle-driven pricing.

Solidity · LayerZero V2 · ERC-7540 · Pyth

Perpetual DEX

A perp DEX on Arbitrum where the production system is the work: liquidator and keeper services, three subgraphs, a NestJS backend, and an end-to-end suite driving the real UI through MetaMask.

Solidity · Hardhat · The Graph · TradingView · Synpress

ERC-8009

A proposed Ethereum standard for balance-delta-constrained signing — a stateless proxy that lets a signer verify exactly which tokens move before signing, with a Trezor firmware demo.

Solidity · Hardhat + Ignition · viem · Safe Apps SDK

Audit-ready by default

Solidity code here is written for the auditor before it is written for the demo: 100% branch coverage as the baseline, invariant and fuzz testing on protocol-critical paths, threat modeling at the design stage, and audit coordination with Hacken and Sherlock as part of delivery — not an upsell. That discipline is why the track record shows 0 post-release criticals across 100+ mainnet deliveries.

It also changes what hiring feels like: you are not buying hours and hoping the output survives review. The deliverable is a contract system an external auditor can walk through without the usual round of architectural rework.

Standards depth

The team works at the standards level, not just with them: compliance-heavy issuance on ERC-3643 and ERC-1400, vault semantics on ERC-4626 and its async extension ERC-7540, and ERC-8009 — a proposed Ethereum standard authored and maintained by RedDuck engineers, down to a hardware-wallet signing demo. When your protocol needs a mechanism the standard does not cover, you want engineers who have been on the authoring side of one.

How you get a team

/01

Scoping call

You talk to engineers, not sales. We challenge the assumptions, map what actually needs to be built, and say no if the product should not be built at all.

/02

Team composition

You get a named composition matched to the scope — contract engineers, QA, DevOps — with an architecture take attached, so you approve a plan, not a headcount.

/03

Delivery rhythm

Short iterations against a visible backlog: contracts, tests, and infrastructure land together, with audit preparation running as part of development rather than after it.

/04

Audit and handover

External audit coordinated on our side, findings closed, then mainnet deployment with full authority handover — repository, keys, and infrastructure end up in your hands.

Smart Contract DevelopmentThe service behind this page — EVM and Solana contract engineering, token standards, and audit-ready delivery.Our TeamWho is on the bench: engineers by function and stack, and how the team is distributed.

_FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

After a scoping call and an architecture review — typically days to a few weeks, driven by scope, not by hiring. The bench already exists; there is no cold recruiting between your call and the kickoff. Exact start dates are set on the discovery call.

Both engagement models are available. A dedicated team is a stable bench working against your roadmap month over month. Project-based delivery is a hard scope with a defined contract system, an audit, and a handover at the end. Many clients start project-based and convert to a dedicated team after mainnet.

This is a protocol engineering team, not a junior bench with a senior label. The engineers on these projects own architecture decisions, write invariant and fuzz tests as a matter of course, and have taken systems through external audits with Hacken and Sherlock. Team composition is named before kickoff, so seniority is something you approve, not discover.

Four factors dominate: protocol complexity (novel mechanisms cost more than proven patterns), audit scope (how much surface an external auditor must cover), how much existing infrastructure you reuse, and team composition over time. We quote after an architecture review — a fixed price list for protocol work is a red flag, ours included.

You do. Every engagement ends with a full authority handover: the repository, the deployment keys, and the infrastructure are transferred to you, and the warranty period covers fixes after release. Ownership is the engagement model — that is the difference from staff augmentation.

_GET IN TOUCH

Fill in the short form to start your journey with us

Mark VirchenkoChief Executive OfficerLinkedIn

Hire Solidity Developers_